As a space enthusiast, just like me, I am sure you will have the question that how astronauts or scientists calculate the characteristics of a faraway planet. This question confused me a lot earlier. But one fine day in the past week, I accidentally found the answer...
Since the early 1990's, astronomers have known that extrasolar planets, (or better known 'exoplanets') orbit stars light-years beyond our own solar system. Although most exoplanets are too distant to be directly imaged, detailed studies have been made of their size, composition, and even atmospheric makeup - but how?
Because most exoplanets are too far away (that's why they are exoplanets :-))to be directly imaged, characteristics such as size, composition, and atmospheric makeup must be determined through a variety of indirect methods.
For instance, when an exoplanet passes in front of its star, or transits, it blocks a fraction of the star's light and causes a dip in brightness. This dip can be easily imagined by how the sun dims during an eclipse. Large planets block more light, so the size of the dip can be used to determine the size of the planet. Well! That's pretty straight forward right? So the size is understood but what about other features?
By observing an exoplanet's gravitational pull on its star, astronomers can also determine the planet's mass, and thus calculate its density, to see if it is composed of rock like Earth, or gas like Saturn.
Fun Fact: Planets surrounding a distant star called Gliese have been known to be able to boast life. And all of this is calculated sitting bere on Earth.
But to fully understand an exoplanet, astronomers must study its atmosphere, and the information that they need is encoded during a transit. As the planet crosses its star, its atmosphere absorbs certain wavelengths of light, or colors, while allowing other wavelengths to pass through. Because each molecule absorbs distinct wavelengths, astronomers spread the star's light into its spectrum of colors to see which wavelengths have been absorbed. The dark absorption bands act as molecular fingerprints, revealing the atmosphere's chemical makeup.
Knowing the depth and density of the atmosphere is also important. To figure this out, astronomers observe the transit at many different wavelengths. At wavelengths where more absorption occurs, the planet will appear larger, with the change in size indicating how deeply the atmosphere extends, and its density at different altitudes. Measuring the depth of absorption at each wavelength gives astronomers the planet's transit depth curve, which allows them to model the composition, height, and density of the atmosphere, providing a detailed picture of the planet.
Recent studies suggest that exoplanets and their atmospheres come in a wide variety. At one extreme are hot Jupiters like WASP 19 b, a boiling gas giant that orbits its star far closer than Mercury orbits our Sun. Visitors who could survive the heat might complain about the air quality: planet WASP 19 b's jagged transit depth curve suggests a deep atmosphere of poisonous hydrocarbons, with methane and hydrogen cyanide far more abundant than water. And this has been calculated from Earth!
Fun Fact: Many distant celestial objects are studied the same way exoplanets are, although Mathods may vary...
By contrast, planet Gliese 1214 b is a comparatively inviting waterworld. Its nearly flat transit depth curve hints at a shallow atmosphere of pure steam, enveloping an ocean thousands of kilometers deep, with an interior of hot ice: water solidified by extreme pressure rather than cold.
As detection methods improve, astronomers will search the atmospheres of Earth-size planets for signs of life such as water vapor, oxygen, and methane, taking us one step closer to finding a world like our own, all thanks to some flickering starlight. (And you know why I wrote so)
Posts before October 2021 have been marked as "Old Posts". Less likely, but they might have out dated or incorrect information, ugly looking bits of code, no labels, etc. Don't get me wrong, many of these posts are top-notch and interesting too.
I thought it would be better not to delete or revamp these posts, even if they suck. The bitter truth is that old works always suck, but I take that as a positive tool to convey that I am growing. Besides there's no better way to showcase my journey without these old, messy, poorly written posts!
I thought it would be better not to delete or revamp these posts, even if they suck. The bitter truth is that old works always suck, but I take that as a positive tool to convey that I am growing. Besides there's no better way to showcase my journey without these old, messy, poorly written posts!
Old Post